Quantum Mechanics Meets Construction Scheduling

Watch on YouTube, Spotify or Apple Podcast.

The Challenge

What if the biggest problem in construction scheduling isn't bad data or missed deadlines but the very math we use to create schedules?

In this episode of Beyond Deadlines, I sat down with my cohost Greg Lawton , CEO of Nodes & Links, to unpack his wild theory that quantum mechanics (yes, the stuff behind particle physics) might hold the answer to fixing the broken logic in how we schedule mega projects. Together, we challenge the 70 year old foundation of the Critical Path Method and ask: is it time for something radically different?

Key Takeaways

1. The Critical Path Method might be fundamentally flawed Critical Path assumes project activities are solid and predictable. But research shows they wobble. Durations shift and dependencies aren't always rigid. This makes the entire foundation of scheduling less reliable than we think.

2. Monte Carlo simulations can’t save us While useful, Monte Carlo tools oversimplify reality. They wobble durations randomly, but often produce unreliable results due to technical constraints like the Central Limit Theorem. The result? A spike that hides real risk.

3. Quantum mechanics offers a new way to see projects In quantum theory, possibilities exist in superposition until one outcome collapses into reality. Greg proposes that activities in a schedule could behave the same way. Instead of durations, what if we assigned wave functions?

4. “Wobble” is more dangerous than scope changes Unpredictable delays, what we call wobble, are often the root cause of project failure. And scope changes? They're just another form of wobble. The sooner we track, analyze, and reduce it, the better our projects perform.

5. AI and automation could bring quantum scheduling to life Quantum scheduling isn’t science fiction forever. As tech like real time tracking and AI forecasting evolves, systems may soon assign, adjust, and optimize schedules in ways humans can’t. The robot scheduler might be closer than we think.

6. Project controls must look upstream, not just down Lean and production planning focus on the workface. But the real value? Applying these insights to the entire project lifecycle. You can’t fix a production line without understanding the upstream flow of delays and bottlenecks.

Tactical Takeaway

Start tracking the wobble. Right now.

You don’t need a quantum computer. You just need to measure how much actual durations vary from planned durations, and more importantly, why. Look at permitting delays. Material availability. Crew productivity. Break it down by half days if you can. The more granular your wobble data, the more accurately you can forecast and control your schedule.

Want to get started? Open a spreadsheet. Track three activities this week. Find their wobble. That’s your first step toward better, data driven scheduling.

Watch on YouTube, Spotify or Apple Podcast.